MARKET DISTORTIONS AND GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Government Transparency and Policymaking
This paper identifies conditions under which voters are better off not knowing the policy choices of incumbents: we show that government transparency can actually lower voter welfare. To do so, we analyze a model of political agency where voters face two forms of uncertainty: uncertainty about the incumbent’s policy preferences and uncertainty about the relationship between policies and outcome...
متن کاملGovernment Information Transparency∗
This paper studies a model of announcements by a privately informed government about the future state of the economic activity in an economy subject to recurrent shocks and with distortions due to income taxation. Although transparent communication would ex ante be desirable, we find that even a benevolent government may ex-post be non-informative, in an attempt to countervail the tax distortio...
متن کاملCertification and Market Transparency
We provide elementary insights into the effectiveness of certification to increase market transparency. In a market with opaque product quality, sellers use certification as a signaling device, while buyers use it as an inspection device. This difference alone implies that seller-certification yields more transparency and higher social welfare. Under buyer-certification profit maximizing certif...
متن کاملTransportation Market Distortions
Properly functioning markets effi ciently allocate resources. Such markets must refl ect certain principles, including consumer options, cost-based pricing, and economic neutrality. Transportation markets oft en violate these principles. This report examines these distortions and their implications for transport planning. Transportation market distortions include various types of underpricing o...
متن کاملGovernment Distortions, Bankers’ Pay and Excessive Risk
If debt markets can price the risk of projects accurately, then the interests of shareholders and the regulator diverge. Shareholders see their value maximised by an equity-rewarded executive. However we demonstrate that such executives destroy welfare by selecting excessively risky projects due to two types of government-induced distortions: the debt tax shield and the implicit too-big-to-fail...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the European Economic Association
سال: 2014
ISSN: 1542-4766
DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12052